You are reading without signing in. Sign in or continue as guest to take quizzes and climb the ranks.
NISQ reality
Decoherence, gate errors and readout errors: the three ways a real device disagrees with the simulator.
- 01Define T1, T2, gate error and readout error.
- 02Estimate the success probability of a circuit from its gate counts.
- 03Read the calibration panel of a backend.
| Quantity | Meaning | Heron r2, typical |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | time for |1⟩ to decay toward |0⟩ | ≈ 150–300 µs |
| T2 | time for a superposition's phase to randomise | ≈ 100–250 µs |
| 1q gate error | probability one single-qubit gate goes wrong | ≈ 2–5 × 10⁻⁴ |
| 2q gate error | same for CZ / ECR | ≈ 2–5 × 10⁻³ |
| Readout error | probability a 0 is read as 1 or vice versa | ≈ 1 % |
Ideal versus noisy twin
Run Simulate with the preset 'Ideal + noisy twin'. The GHZ state should be 50/50 on 0000 and 1111; the fake backend leaks probability into the other 14 strings. The Metrics tab reports the Hellinger fidelity between the two.
OPENQASM 3.0;
include "stdgates.inc";
qubit[4] q;
bit[4] c;
h q[0];
cx q[0], q[1];
cx q[1], q[2];
cx q[2], q[3];
c = measure q;
NISQ stands for noisy intermediate-scale quantum: hundreds of qubits, no error correction, circuits limited to a few hundred two-qubit gates before the signal drowns. Everything in this track is about getting useful answers inside that budget.
2 questions · one try each counts
A circuit has 40 CZ gates at 0.4% error each and negligible other errors. Roughly what fraction of shots is error-free?
Sign in to answer and climb the ranks; you will come back to this lesson.
T2 ≤ 2·T1 always. Which process limits T2 but not T1?
Sign in to answer and climb the ranks; you will come back to this lesson.